How I'm going to use the Washington Shield Laws, and then, when all this is over, I'm
going to start a campaign to do away with shield laws. I know that sounds - what's the
word - contrary, hypocritical or something... and I'm going to proceed to tell you why.
I've been lucky all along in these PsyOps because all along, I knew there were a few
people who didn't agree with what is being done to me. In their strange ways, they have
helped me. And, mostly, they have directed me toward information to help me understand.
I have also become privvy to a great deal of classified info. The kind Russell Tice
isn't allowed to tell Congress because the NSA says there is no member of the government
with a high enough security classification to hear what he can tell. Read that again and
make sure you understand what I just wrote. No member of the government. Since I'm not
part of the government, I guess it's okay for me to know.
But guess what? There isn't a single thing you need to know that isn't public domain.
You may not learn every single detail about every technology or PsyOp method, but you
don't need to know all that. Everything I present and talk about on my web sites is either
now public knowledge, fragmented and surrounded by CIA disinformation, but it's all there.
Even more, the technology I present info about is illegal in the European Union.
When they made it illegal to use these weapons, representatives of the CIA and
NATO were there, and asked if they were concerned that it was banned in the EU and their
response was:
"No. It's not a problem for us. The people of the United
States don't know about it yet."
Sounds like more media and government deception and disinformation going on here. Hmm..
But what is secret is who these insiders are, how they have informed me, and the things
they have told me in order to help me over the hump, and use my audacity to help thousands
of people who are suffering, and have suffered much worse than me. They work for
intelligence agencies and corporate news channels. Hmm, who could they be?
I wrote a song once with this line "It's hard to imagine there's people hurting
worse than me all over the world..." and I always felt weird about that lyric because
I always knew people were hurting worse than me, and figured if I ever played that song
for anyone I'd have to change it, but it worked in the phrasing at the time.
The point is, I just want people to understand from the beginning that I go out of my
way to make sure I only publish corroborated reports. No speculation. I try to keep away
from hype and hysteria, conspiracy theories and the like. Sure, I have opinions, but I
would never suggest they are right - just my opinions, conclusions - established as a
baseline to compare new discoveries to...
And I'm going to use the shield laws as I need to. I believe I actually do fit the
legal description of a journalist, particularly since I have been employed by other
businesses in that capacity, and if I were not being diminished by electronic attacks, I
would be working with people the likes of whom have worked with Nobel winners, pulitzer
winners and many bigger things than having to waste my life fighting a corrupt government.
And all for good, charitable causes.
So, I guess I can take the heat in Washington, and I hope you have a comfy bed for me
in the Federal facility if you think it will help you continue the cover up of the worst
human rights violations I have ever heard of in the history of humanity. The worst. And
they're happening. And it's the Federal Government. And it WILL stop.
Got that? (Where the hell is that picture of Tienemen Square, anyway?) I will never
reveal my sources. Since everything I say will lead to documented sources, thanks to my
friends, you'll have a hell of a time proving I've said anything untrue unless you
manufacture evidence or - reveal everything you've been doing to me/us in order to prove
me wrong or reveal a source. And even then, I won't tell and I won't lie.
I'm going to spill my guts.
There is no statute of limitations on human and civil rights violations, George.
Have a good time in Paraguay.
And when I'm done, I'm going to require a law that rewards government and corporate
whistleblowers, and criminally penalizes those who harm them then or anytime in the
future, and make sure people know - again - that it's okay to do the right thing.
And then there won't need to be a shield law. Because if the government won't enforce
it, the Atty General of the United States will be personally prosecuted automatically by
Federal Atty's in that Dept... any one of those attorneys.. as mandated by law, and
failure to comply results in an automatic contempt of Congress charges accompanied by a $1
million dollar fine.Per report, per day. How about, ignored 30 days causes required
presidential impeachment hearings.
Okay, I'm a little worked up, but I think the idea is a good one.
PS Just for fun: There is one document on the www.democraticfundamentalism.org
web site that I didn't get corroborated. Just 1. Can you find it?