I am writing to you today in response to 
your recent testimony before the committee chaired by Sen. Mary
Landrieu (D-La). I found it to be compelling, and believe I can provide you with the
benefit of some 6 years of research that will inform you of the true nature of the
issues that must be considered in regard to the future of Galveston, and it concerns
technology and policies that are not commonly known, but about which information is freely
available in the public domain.
But first, I wanted to share with you my complete empathy with the moving statements
you made that caused you to pose the question "Is Galveston Worth Saving?"
I understand that feeling more than you might know, and it is an empty, hollow
feeling that never really leaves you, even long after repairs are made and new
construction takes the place of the old.
In 1989, I was a resident of Scotts Valley, California when the Loma Prieta
Earthquake struck. Of course, most people relate that quake with San Francisco, and
the collapse of the Bay Bridge... and the significant damage done to the freeway systems.
Thank God there was limited loss of life. It could have been much worse. Yet, the house
where I lived was less than 5 miles from the epicenter. We lived with nerve-rattling
aftershocks for months.
But, the worst part was the destruction of the old section of downtown Santa Cruz. The
destruction included an historic building called "The Cooper House", the
restoration of which caused me to participate in fundraising events and street fairs for a
couple of years.. all gone in a matter of moments, old memories, like old friends, never
to be seen again, and their presence sorely missed.
I can imagine that many people have the same feeling when disasters strike where they
live, and especially their home towns. That's why I believe it's so important that you
understand this information which is relative to the answer to the question "Is
Galveston Worth Saving?"
The information I have to provide you is also reminiscent of a part of the Bible
Revelations 10:8 And the voice which I heard from Heaven spake unto me again,
and said, go and take the little book, which is open in the hand of the angel which
standeth upon the sea and upon the earth
Revelations 10:9 And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the
little book. And he said unto me, Take it and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly
bitter, but it shall be in they mouth sweet as honey.
This, because the information I will provide you will provide you reasonable proof of
my claims, proof that will, before long, become evidence in civil and criminal court. I'm
have no doubt that you will want to disbelieve and reject it as much as I did when I did
the research and discovered what I have to tell you. So, I simply ask that you read this
information, this truth, and consider it... and if you do that, I am certain you will know
the appropriate thing to do. Because if there's anything I perceived about you is that you
love people, you love Galveston, and you love your country. The same reasons I am
compelled to deliver this news to you.
For me, it begins when my father performed a "science experiment" in our home
in East Palo Alto, California, sometime in about 1959-1960.
My father was involved in extremely classified work at the San Francisco Naval Shipyard
at Hunter's Point. The Bay there is currently in trouble because of the radioactive
pollution caused by radium. The common story is that the source of this pollution is
because of the mooring of nuclear vessels and the handling of nuclear weapons over the
years.
But, my father's "science experiment" demonstration for his 6 kids was to
show us how the government was able to generate hurricanes, tornadoes and cyclones by
"stirring up" natural weather forces with the radiation of radium, causing
abnormal warming of the waters and with just a little wind, causing massive storms unlike
those seen before. He did the same thing with a tiny little chip of radium in the bottom
of a 10 gallon fish tank, and it roared so loudly and shook so much I ran out of the
room in fear.
To be certain I am being clear about what I am saying, I will summarize. The United
States Government has been performing weather modification since the mid to late 1950's,
using radioactive materials. Experimentation and use of that technology is at least
partially to blame for the radioactive pollution of the San Francisco Bay, according to
the information I believe my father purposely leaked to me as a child in case the use of
this technology became irresponsible. I have a great deal of evidence to cause me to
believe this.
In 2000, being a journalist and broadcaster off and on for some 20+ years, I
decided to do a great deal more research, utilizing standard documentation and internet
resources, working to get to the bottom of conspiracy theories and to sort through the
hysteria of purposeful and unintentional disinformation.
I check everything out, so I want you to know that the next part, which no one including myself wants to hear, directly impacts
what you must consider when answering the questions about the future of Galveston.
After Hurricane Katrina, I was monitoring certain groups of internet chat rooms, and
came across an email from someone saying that the BUSHCLINTONKATRINAFUND.ORG website
was online before the hurricane hit. I thought to myself, alright, one more crazy
thing to check out to see what would cause people to think that, because there's usually
some reason for a rumor like that. But, given the governmental deceptions - especially in
the last 8 years - I decided it was easy enough to research, and, in fact it was.
It was easy to check out, and it was true. I even checked with Network
Solutions via email to be sure that I did not misinterpret what I read on their web site,
the primary registry for internet domains on behalf of ICANN, the official Internet
Regulatory Agency. And they assured me, via email, that indeed, the
Bush-Clinton-Katrina Fund website was online as of June 14th 2005. Hurricane Katrina
struck on August 29th. I have retained these documents as evidence.
A great deal more detail about this is online at:
http://www.charlesrehn.com/charlesrehn/books/aconversationwithamerica/talkbacktoleaders/clintonbushkatrinafundsite.htm
For the moment, simply consider the implications of that statement, and then, for the
sake of intellectual argument and honesty, consider the following additional truths. And
when doing so, I request you view this information in the context of the knowledge of how
and why national and international politics is actually driven, as Benjamin Disraeli
instructed us long ago.
The United States, and many other nations, began working on Weather Modification for environmental warfare purposes long ago. If
you were to read Donald Rumsfeld's and the Pentagon's White Paper on Total Spectrum
Domination, a military approach to population pacification and control forwarded by the
Bush Administration and the Council on Foreign Relations, which is what will in the short
term generate the North American Union.
In the area of weather modification (and more) they have developed a system called
"HAARP" which is used to warm the ionosphere, leading to a variety of effects
including hurricanes, earthquakes and a variety of electromagnetic effects harmful to the
environment and people. HAARP is the United States version of the Russian Woodpecker
system, which is known, among other things, to have caused a snow storm in Crescent City,
California, back in 1990.
More information on HAARP and the effects of this electromagnetic effect can be found
at www.democraticfundamentalism.org,
and another very useful site is at www.weatherwars.info
There is also information that provides reason to believe the recent
earthquakes in China were caused by HAARP. The same would be true of the
Indonesian earthquake and Tsunami. And much more, including the 2 years of drought that
struck North Korea, leading to North Korea's agreement to end nuclear materials
enrichment.
In a related matter, this link will provide information regarding Yassir Arafat and
Ariel Sharon that is consistent with the recent anuerysm afflictions of Kim Jong Il
(and their decision to resume uranium enrichment) and many members of the U.S. Congress.
It's important to note that politicians these days refer to Climate Change as being
man-made and have begun to pull away from the use of the phrase Global Warming. The reason
is because Climate Change is man-made, but the idea of Global Warming, unnatural warming
of the earth due to pollution, is a myth.
In fact, Climate Change is being caused by the use of weather modification devices such
as HAARP. And, once again, when you acknowledge the real reasons that economic and
cultural political trends and policies are enacted as directed, you begin to recognize the
pattern of the use of weather modification in clear patterns. As they always say, follow
the money.
As I explain this to you, consider the number of islands in the Gulf of Mexico which
have been obliterated because of Gustav and Ike. And if there was an industry that would
benefit from the shallowing of the Gulf and removing obstacles to shipping, what
industry would that be?
The First Signs of "Global Warming"
In mid-2002, I began tracking storm patterns, particularly in relation to historical
weather trends, and immediately noticed a sharp increase in the number of tornadoes and
floods in the Midwest. In addition, France and Germany, and all of Europe, had incredible
storms and floods that left many nations declaring their defense budgets would need to be
slashed in order to fund flood repairs.
George Bush announced that climate change would occur, in ways that included the death
of high-altitude and alpine environments like Yosemite's Touolmne Meadows, which is
occurring, just as heat and drought are crumbling Yosemite's mountains, and fires destroy
its forests.
This was followed the next season by equivalent droughts and heat waves, leading to the
collapse of the French electrical grid due to the overuse of air-conditioning. Many people
died. And, nuclear reactors in France came dangerously close to melt-down because they
weren't prepared to deal with external temperatures the likes of which they faced.
All over the world, the environment is changing at a rapidly increasing pace. Even Mt.
Fuji and California's Mt. Shasta lose their snowcaps each year now.
In that same time period, we began hearing reports of the effects of global warming,
including the rapid melting of the ice caps, most notably in the Arctic. Scientists
predicted that if warming continued at that rate, the Beaufort Sea and waters eastward
would sufficiently that a year-round shipping lane could be established. When you consider
the natural resources - oil, gold, silver and more - that would become easily available to
industrialists if these ice melts were to occur, you begin to understand why they would
use a device like HAARP to warm areas of the planet to reveal such resources.
The same kind of thing is happening around the world, and if examined, one can only
conclude that weather modification, including earthquakes caused by HAARP, are being used
for the purposes of terraforming.
The evidence I uncovered about the Hurricane Katrina disaster, including this Montauk,
NY Lighthouse Museum (see page 19), make it fairly evident that Hurricane Ike was not
a natural disaster. Its formation and behavior was anything but typical or predictable for
a hurricane. Its immenseness and slow speed are clear indications that it was not of its
size because of normal conditions. My info tells me that Gulf Waters are cooler this year
than previous years, which means that hurricanes approaching the U.S. from the Gulf of
Mexico should be smaller and much less intense, if they were to make groundfall at all.
So, unfortunately, what I request you seriously look into before answering the question
"Is Galveston Worth Saving?" is the actual intent of the United States
Government. And to acknowledge, at least to yourself, that weather modification has been
going on for a very long time, since before the current Bush Administration (and I'm not
referring to simple cloud seeding).
When you see the information for yourself, I'm sure you will be just as stumped as I am
about what there is to do about this. However, given that you are in an elected position
and are committed to your community, I hope that you will be empowered to do what is best
for all concerned.
Sincerely,
Charles Rehn
