Contact:
Paul Baird
7 Redgum Circuit
Glendenning 2761
Ph: 0011 61 2 9675 4529
Fax: 0011 61 2 8838 2333
Email: p.baird@surveillanceissues.com
Guestbook: Leave
a message
 NB: The satellites are not available to law enforcement agencies. Instead they protect illegal operators (like drug traders and corporate criminals) who in fact spy on law enforcers, lobbyists etc. They also facilitate remote, non-consensual human experimentation by the US military, the CIA and so on. In fact when asked who was centrally responsible - the military, defence contractors, the agencies, the media, or the mafia - one senior AFP executive replied: "Well, they all have access don't they". |
They can listen
WHO ARE "THEY"?
CRIMINALS !
(Corrupt "Businessmen" / |
(Source - US Congress Office of Technology Assessment)
|
N.B. Even phones can be made "hot on the hook" i.e. turned into microphones when not in use.
N.B. In many countries the military operates tracking stations; assisting the giant American National Security Agency. The NSA covertly monitors every call, fax, e-mail, telex and computer data message. The relevant computers search for key words/phrases. Anything/anyone of interest is drawn to the attention of agency operatives. This can lead to a large scale personal surveillance operation by the NSA or other agencies; like the CIA and their criminal connections. The current system is called ECHELON.
It is evident that countless people (world wide) have already lodged complaints about the following technologies. They are available to government agencies, defense contractors and "organised" crime figures.
The combined use of these technologies enables remote torture and interrogation. (Memories are triggered by neurophone questioning and the brain wave analysers deliver the answers). Any nebulous arguments about US national security and the need for classified research on human subjects speak for themselves. (The writer has a copy of a White House internal memo, signed by Bill Clinton on these matters). Remember that in the past CIA mind control experiments have involved LSD as well as electro-shock treatment. The MK Ultra (Mind Control) program itself is infamous as are the instances where implants have been detected by X-Ray etc. Also there are those experimented on under the the cover of 'Alien visits'. Today, Neurophone and mind reading technologies are at the forefront of similar programs. In many ways these new technologies are an even more sinister means of conducting illegal human experiments. Colonel John Alexander, advising head of NATO'S non-lethal weapon initiative, is the main proponent of these technologies. He favours all manner of devices which can, from a distance, induce illnesses, read minds and covertly harass innocent targets. If he could he would implant a microchip in each newborn child and initiate a mind control programme designed to brainwash the entire planet or at least those not fully in tune with their New World Order. Even to entertain such a thought is criminally insane yet he has said such things in public. In fact Scientific American magazine and the major Scandinavian newspaper, Helsingen Sanomat, have suggested all people will be implanted with a DNA microchip in the future. E.g Prince William has already been implanted (for "location" purposes?) while some U.S Military/Agency personnel, including NASA astronauts, have been implanted so as to study their thoughts/emotions etc. Think of the possibilities for robotics and cloning in the future. Remember, these technologies (developed for times of war / terrorism) are (post cold war) being used today on lobbyists, intellectual dissenters and peaceful activists; to discredit and silence them. (So much for democracy.) Notably different methods are often used on different victims within a certain area (city) so as to avoid providing a pattern for investigators to observe. This also provides a cross section of political targets for their experimental programs. It is also noteworthy
that some of the victims are ex-agency / military personnel who have rebelled
or tried to blow the whistle on corrupt practices within these organisations.
Some of these report that not only have the thoughts and emotions of millions
of targets been catalogued by military/intelligence agencies but all such
agencies have political/mafia/media links due to both infiltration and
association. Many of the actual monitors/harassers are also recruited
from the worst possible sources. N.B. These technologies are invariably used in conjuction with satellite (audio / visual) surveillance; creating the effect of an electronic POW concentration camp. Mental rape is only one of the many crimes committed in this mobile environment. E.g scientists, writers, political/military leaders etc can have their intellectual property stolen at the source. Without doubt the computers store and analyse the intelligence gathered by surveillance/harassment technologies. Their vast memories allow detailed studies of how the human mind works so as to learn how to influence and/or control people. Duplicating these processes for robotics and other artificial intelligence purposes is another sinister goal. The US and other world governments are guilty of fostering gross human rights abuses by using these methods. Their covert operators can now do their worst without fear of detection. The cost is justified by the control gained and the experimental results achieved. Of course, (as with the space program and military expenditures in general) the funds used could be better spent solving real problems like hunger, disease, poverty and crime.
On a positive note... (iv) UNIDIR (The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research) has issued a media guide to disarmament esp. re weapons of mass destruction. Non-lethal weapons are listed and the list includes mind control weapons. Resolutions, treaties, international conventions/laws must quickly be introduced to bridge the gap between rapidly advancing (and usually 'classified') technologies and inadequate laws. UN weapons inspectors should then seek access to government (et al) facilities (worldwide - including the U.S.) to eradicate these evil weapons. (V.) ON 28TH DECEMBER
2003 THE MICHIGAN GOVERNOR SIGNED PUBLIC ACTS 256 AND 257 (EFFECTIVE 1/1/04).
THESE OUTLAW THE USE OF ANY EM WEAPON ON ANYONE. PENALTY - 15 YEARS-LIFE.
However these are only promises recognising the problem. None have yet bore fruit. The use of most "non-lethal" weapons contravenes the spirit of all privacy laws and criminal codes as well as every relevant code and convention in play internationally; including The Declaration of Human Rights. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The Geneva Convention and The Nuremberg Code. The perpetrators are guilty of crimes against humanity. Those supporting them are engaging in class warfare of the worst kind.
Satellite Spies
|
| 1. | U.S. Patent
#5,123,899. June 23rd, 1992. Description: A system for stimulating the brain to exhibit specific brain wave rhythms and thereby altering the subjects' state of consciousness. |
| 2. | U.S. Patent
#5,289,438. February 22nd, 1994. Description: A system for the simultaneous application of multiple stimuli (usually aural) with different frequencies and waveforms. Purpose: To disorientate/manipulate a target. |
Silent Subliminal
Messages: U.S. Patent #5,159,703.
October 27th, 1992. Inventor - Dr Oliver M. Lowry.
Description: A communication system in which non aural carriers
(in the very low or high audio frequency range or the ultrasonic frequency
spectrum) are amplified or frequency modulated with the desired "intelligence",
and propagated acoustically or vibrationally for inducement directly into
the brain. This can be done "live" or recorded/stored on magnetic, mechanical
or optical media for delayed/repeated transmission to the target. Sound
can also be induced by radiating the head with microwaves (in the range
100 to 10,000 mhz) that are modulated with a waveform consisting of frequency
modulated bursts.
Purpose: To instruct or pass messages; in theory. In reality it's
used to torment political/military targets. (One unpublicised application
was the Gulf War)
OTHER KNOWN
TECHNOLOGIES CURRENTLY UNDER SECRECY ORDERS
Brainwave Scanners/Programs: First program developed in
1994 by Dr. Donald York & Dr. Thomas Jensen.
Description: A personal scanning and tracking system involving
the monitoring of an individuals EMF via remote means; eg. Satellite.
The results are fed to thought activated computers that possess a complete
brainwave vocabulary.
Purpose: Practically, communication with stroke victims and brain-activated
control of modern jets are two applications. However, more often, it is
used to mentally rape a civilian target; their thoughts being referenced
immediately and/or recorded for future use.
Note: In conjunction with Neurophone technology, this is a mechanism
for remote interrogation/torture via satellite.
EEG Cloning:
Description: A system whereby the target's EMF is monitored remotely
and EEG results fed back to them (or others) to mimic emotional patterns;
eg. Fear, anger etc.
Purpose: To induce emotional/psychological responses. For example,
the feedback of Delta waves may induce drowsiness since these are familiar
when in deep sleep.
CONCLUSION
This entire bracket of weapons was referred to by L.Brezhnev in 1978 when
he told US President J.Carter that there should be a unilateral ban on
certain secret weapons "more frightful than the mind of man has ever
conceived". And clearly there are many others that we are yet to
learn about; including advanced forms of infrasound weapons that can induce
organ damage/illness from remote sources (esp.satellites).
What's needed includes the following:
| 1. | A UN Satellite committee and non-lethal weapons inspectors. |
| 2. | An International Criminal Court prepared to handle class actions brought by the victims. |
| 3. | A growth in public awareness regarding the testing of experimental technologies. |
Finally, it may also be worth noting the comments of one senior investigator from NASA'S Inspector Generals Office. Having conceded the existence of such technologies and commenting on the evil uses to which they are put he advised: "I suggest you pray".
PATENT REFERENCES
| 1. | Mind Control: Neurophone www.nettimakako/mind/neurop.htm . |
| 2. | www.mk.net/mcf/resrc-hm.htm #3 Lee Books |
| 3. | The military use of electromagnetic,and mind control technology, Armen Victoria (PO Box 99, Westport District Office, Nottingham, N.G.8 3NT UK) |
Article
Introduction
Despite the defensiveness of groups suspected of having a secret agenda
people will always believe that wherever there is concealment there could
well be a conspiracy. Equally, if too many people are involved, you could
have dissention due to conflicting views. This could lead to ultimate
failure…Successful "plotting" therefore seems to be effected when certain
privileged groups, clubs, fraternities or societies of like-minded, and
wealthy, individuals band together to direct people and events to suit
their own vested interests. Unfortunately such groups promote inequality,
prejudice and often crime by their actions. These problems are the focus
of this article.
SECRET
SOCIETIES
The higher profile groups, like political parties, religious organizations
and so on, govern, to a certain extent, openly. They have large numbers
of members. However the smaller, less well known, groups are often the
worst in terms of prejudice, promoting their own through the ranks of
any hierarchy, be it political, judicial, bureaucratic or whatever. By
so doing such groups infiltrate and impose their views, standards and
lifestyles on others in an underhanded, clandestine manner. Some have
a finger in every pie. Along the way they alienate and destroy many who
question or oppose their selfish goals. The groups or societies in question
also seek to protect their operations using subterfuge and lies to enlist
the unwitting help of those around them AND other criminal connections.
The ostensibly innocent often damn themselves by their silence, their
apathy, their fear.
For good or bad some of the better known clandestine societies include:- The Bildeberg Club, The Club of Rome, The Illuminati, The Mafia, The British Round Table, The Knights Templar, The Freemasons, The Trilateral Commission, The Council of Foreign Relations, The RIIA, The Travistock Institute, The KKK, The Skull and Bones Society and The Project for the New American Century. Many World leaders are members of these influential organizations. For example, failure to attend the annual Bildeberg Club meeting is said to all but ensure failure at the next national elections.
Additionally, there is an ever more worrying proliferation of criminally based networks of paedophiles, satanists, cultists, illegal researchers and so on. Each watches out for its own members and thereby allows them to prosper and multiply. The more of them there are in any field of endeavour, any sphere or sector, the more acceptable their ways and so the greater their influence. Many use various forms or terrorism to achieve their goals…
A SUBTLER
TERRORISM
In the Middle East, the perceived hub or terrorism for us in the West,
many brand the US as "The Great Satan". This is as much for their oppressive
stance in the zone as for their perceived immorality. Certainly there's
no denying that The New World Order is an American concept. Likewise,
we in the west are encouraged to see Islamic/Arabic extremists from that
region as devils; fanatics waging a cowardly, "holy" war based on religious
differences. Their collective hatred is supposedly directed, indiscriminately,
at Jews, Westerners etc. Neither extreme view is strictly correct and
even then it only applies to some. However, both sets of leaders are,
with their allies, guilty of manipulation, provocation and escalation.
This has led to numerous, tragic acts of terrorism in recent years; the
World Trade Centre disaster, The Bali bombings and so on. Whoever they
are/were and wherever they're from they do/did Satan's work.
Now, "terrorism" is defined as the use of violence OR INTIMIDATION to achieve your goals. Therefore, the abhorrent use of psychological and emotional violence, pressure or harassment is just as much an act of terror as a violent hijacking or a suicide bombing. So, bloodless hostage crises, political or state repression/oppression, covert agency harassment, media fear campaigns etc are all acts of terrorism. Accordingly, the unregulated media mafia, the unchecked government spy agencies and so on should all be placed under careful scrutiny during any legitimate "war on terror". However we know why that won't happen. Most people fear corrupt media representatives and covert agency people (e.g. the CIA) more than anyone else, and with good reason. So much so that mere mention of their involvement instills such fear that it's an absolute conversation stopper; evidence of the worst terrorism imaginable. And unlike known terrorist networks they cannot be questioned let alone stopped. Of course, as the truth is always an early casualty anyway, the media/agency/crime figures involved replace it with whatever they choose; pointing away from themselves with suitable indignation and outrage.
STATE
SPONSORED TERROR
Many of the US's enemies were trained and armed by the US. This, coupled
with subsequent provocation of those enemies, must be recognized as part
of the terrorism problem. The provocateur escapes detection then uses
the retaliation as an excuse to escalate activity. The fact that money
is generated by all of this is both a central and disturbing truth that
is being largely ignored. If there was nothing to gain by it then it wouldn't
happen. The public are also unaware that covert methods are used. For
example…Regular readers of "Exposure" and now "Hard Evidence" will be
familiar with the existence of high tech' satellite, microwave and ground
based weapons such as thought scanners, advanced neurophones and the like.
Unlike the deaf-friendly miraphone, modern neurophone based technologies
are weapons used for state-sponsored crime effected by agencies like the
CIA, NSA, DIA, and their criminal "business" associates. The technology
allows operatives to use advanced computer programs and voice overs to
deliver aural harassment/threats etc into the brains of millions worldwide
via microwave and satellite. Satellite brainwave monitors and powerful
computers (at secret facilities and relay stations) also allow for the
deciphering of the targets thoughts, simultaneously. This will be explained
more fully later on but suffice to say for now that the mind reading capabilities
of the relevant technologies are another conversation stopper…not because
of disbelief but because of fear.
The result of applying such techniques can be varied across the community. Prominent persons who hold terrible secrets may suicide, while unstable psychopaths and assassins may be driven to commit murder(s). Meanwhile, protestors, writers, human rights campaigners, whistleblowers etc may be severly traumatized by long term exposure to techno-based torture and oppression. The results can be discrediting. Some can even be wrongly institutionalized. Notably, nursing homes, asylums and jails house many victims. They are easy targets for illegal human experimentation but, interestingly enough, most who are targeted, have a "political" background. To debase anyone is bad enough but to exacerbate the suffering of such people is unbelievably cruel.
Yet another form of all too common terrorism is the media feedback of surveillance results. This is often facilitated by the state through MP's, agency personnel etc, who set up the spying, then relay the frequencies or pass on results. How it works is that any unwelcome (though private) comment leads to a response (directly with live TV/radio or later if not).
Your own words/views/thoughts/actions etc are thrown back at you from the surveillance, usually from the appropriate public figure or sector (with or without their knowledge). It often takes the form of a threat. For example, the writers 91 yr old Aunt, who lives at Parramatta, had a turn and was taken to Westmead hospital. The next day, as I prepared to take the final draft of this article to my typing service (near my Aunts home) I listened to the morning radio news. The no.1 item was about a 91 yr old Parramatta woman (not my Aunt) who'd died at Westmead hospital after a bashing outside her home. Investigation and subsequent reports revealed that the news details were (deliberately) incorrect. "They" search for coincidences, then time and prioritise the reports in an attempt to terrorise their targets. When all else fails they just make it up. The facts are wrong but the intention is clear.
The blame could be with whoever gets the surveillance results (solicited, intercepted etc). That may be a researcher, a writer, editor, stage manager, exec or presenter but all of them know what goes on. The presenter is usually blamed, at least initially. This can lead to the victim looking like an obsessed fan or something; a neat arrangement for discrediting people. Infact many have fallen for this trap. Some have even been wrongly institutionalised as a result of false complaints lodged by criminals/celebrities working for corrupt media empires. Despite the general public's suspicions most don't realise that the media's role in controlling knowledge, perceptions and beliefs extends to this sort of crime (against those who offend their criminal associates).
In any event, taking an undue interest in a non public figure to the point of spying on them (yet refusing to talk to them) reveals the foul intentions of all involved in such practices...and those journos that oppose it are unwelcome in mainstream media circles. So only those who are complicit or silent survive. Therefore, to give these media terrorists the benefit of the doubt, to trust anyone in the mass media once victimized in this manner, is to make a serious error in judgement. Lies are spread, recordings made and there is no privacy at all. One example of this involved a female whistleblower contending with corrupt media execs, at channel 7. They lodged a false complaint through their own media "crime stoppers" people with "friendly"/corrupt police. It was said that she was about to rob a bank. This stopped her whistleblowing and she hid in her house for fear of being framed/set up with weapons, drugs etc. The terrible realization that those you should be able to turn to for help are fully culpable themselves is shattering for most. Equally the culprits go into denial and, in any event, are beyond the reach of any frustrated/honest law enforcers who may offer to help.
Getting back to the governments themselves…with the legal/constitutional amendments taking place these days (supposedly only to combat terrorism) we now have a situation where innocent people can be framed/tortured/oppressed by the state with "terrorist watch" type excuses used to suppress the truth. Secretive societies, even groups of criminally connected "mates", can arrange this all too easily through their contacts…and a conspiracy of silence covers it up. It's an excellent way of victimising and isolating people.
To illustrate, recent responses to the September 11, (01) tragedy have seen civil liberties take a battering, bringing democracy itself under fire. Draconion laws have been passed and corrupt agencies are covertly targeting supposed suspects who I'm sure are (usually) nothing more than concerned citizens exercising their democratic rights. By "pretending" to doubt a target and refusing to talk with them agencies (like the CIA, DIA, MOSSAD, MI6, ASIS, ONA etc) can use their arsenal of "anti-citizen" weapons in a trial of how to terrorise/silence/discredit people. Those responsible remain "beyond reproach" using remote space-based technologies etc and quoting "National Security" as their justification for silence and the secrecy orders placed on the weapons themselves. As a result the public don't question this because they don't know the technologies exist.
So…we have a situation wherein patriotic, compassionate people who are raising awareness on important issues can not only be terrorized by government agencies (silenced on behalf of corrupt "business" interests) but they can also be falsely accused to justify the surveillance in the first place. The "Don't talk to them" attitude of the ruling class and associated "clubs" fuels the situation, along with their involvement in harassment directed at the targets who are usually totally innocent, of anything.
In the post cold war era crimes against citizens are becoming a more substantial part of agency operatives work. Protected agency/"business" operations (like the drug and arms trades, prostitution, paedophile networks etc) cannot be questioned without consequences, especially for ordinary, unconnected people. These same people can be offered up for experimental programs where techniques and technologies are employed to study how to control/silence them…The visible results could be anything from minor stress through to institutionalisation or even death. This, of course is in keeping with the M.O. of criminals who trade in human misery and murder (i.e. drug barons, arms dealers, terrorists etc).
This all leads to another question. Isn't failure to act on the part of an individual or agency part of the terrorist cycle? The technology mentioned could solve the terrorist problem but that's not what "they" want. Firstly, the space-based equipment available allows all telecommunications to be intercepted (Echelon), then there's the audio-visual monitoring of "persons of interest" and neurophone/brain-scanning of unconnected targets…So why experiment with whistleblowers and decent people of any sort while ignoring known terrorists? Maybe September 11 type tragedies are allowed or even orchestrated by some vested interest groups with agency connections; loathsome criminals who deliberately stir up trouble and actively work against prevention or apprehension. After all, Big Brother does see all. So, because any "agent" moving in the field would be spotted they use patsies and Manchurian candidates to do their dirty work and take the blame. This applies equally to individual assassinations (e.g. John Lennon's death) and terrorist acts (like September 11).
CENSORSHIP
To control the flow of ideas and information "they" must control publishing,
broadcasting and the mass media in general. So the number of popular,
published authors is kept to a manageable level. These, in turn, feed
off the plethora of unpublished material and, in the case of harassers,
surveillance/agency information as well. This indicates something further
about the systems by which organizations remain both prejudiced and hidden.
The ugly truth is that freedom of thought/expression is an ideal not a
reality. To dismiss writings is one matter. To harass/destroy the writer
is another.
Now propaganda can, like consent, be total invention. Control of the mainstream media allows this to happen. Every media outlet is controlled otherwise classified information would be leaked to the general public. So "they" place or hire people to fill crucial roles and thereby ensure this. A good example was the recent Iraqi war, 2003. Debate raged prior to troop deployment, and in fact only three nations were actively involved, but once troops were committed to the fight the media was almost 100% behind the effort; the public reasoning being that our troops needed our total support. However, there's little democracy or common sense in that. The soldiers always have our sympathy/support anyway but the instigators of any conflict, on either side, need to be questioned on their motives before everyone just accepts war as a necessary evil.
The links between the Arabic political leaders and the terrorists, the weapons sales and build ups, the stated intentions etc were all too readily accepted, as presented. The money, the resources, the power up for grabs (on both sides) were matters not fully addressed. Only afterwards were better questions raised about the legitimacy of the whole affair. Why, for example, is there still no concrete evidence for the UN to support the action, even after the event? Why don't they all assist (through member nations) in the rebuilding of Iraq?
Another good example is in the area of dual purposes. Many satellites, for instance, have frightening abilities (to torment, mind rape and kill) but the public only hear about telecommunications, weather and recon capabilities. Similarly, people working as PI's, security guards, journalists, MP's etc can also work for and/or with "them", thereby compromising their legitimate work.
Clearly, suppression of information occurs at many levels, and the world stage really is full of excellent actors. They say all the right things; some even openly supporting charities, causes and so on but they secretly work in a conspiratorial fashion to destroy genuinely good people. As a result the truth may never surface on many matters esp. where those speaking out are emotionally, psychologically (even physically) tormented for their troubles. Public figures contend with threatened public ridicule/exposure (on other matters) for dissenting but non public figures can be tortured etc. Neurophones, brain scanners and directed energy weapons can create a mobile P.O.W situation that's indescribably oppressive. To even question the ruling class's crimes can leave some like modern day Galileos (under house arrest - figuratively) for merely expressing their views. All violence is wrong but State sponsored terrorism (emotional, physical or psychological) is the worst intimidation imaginable, especially when it's media backed.
It's claimed that the most powerful weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed. To control our minds they need acceptance and absorption (by the masses) of all the educational, media, government propaganda that we're exposed to. Those elements of the truth which, like public "acting", conceal the lies and deception are essential to their plans. So, in response, we need to read and see a little less and think a lot more. An example is the illicit drug trade; one of the scourges of most modern societies. Drugs are used to control/occupy both those in public life who indulge and those non public figures who follow their lead but cannot cope or even afford it long term. Following the money/control trail is a good indicator of who it is that's behind it. The most powerful vested interest groups, "societies" and individuals are, like the mass media that shapes our very thinking, linked to and/or controlled by organised crime and corrupt bureaucracies, through their agents/employees. These are the connections that point to the ugly truth.
THE HYPOCRISY
The hardest thing to come to grips with is the breathtaking hypocrisy
of our political/media/business leaders. Only complicit or compliant people
reach the upper levels of these sectors so we find media identities denouncing
terrorists on the one hand while at the same time (and sometimes with
"feedback" in the same item) terrorizing their own fellow citizens who
are genuinely concerned. Also, Western democracies, esp. the U.S, are
guilty of gross hypocrisy on matters like terrorism, torture, harassment,
false institutionalization, weapons of mass destruction, human rights,
religious persecution and much more. For instance, there are no U.N weapons
inspectors swarming over Defence/CIA/NASA facilities searching for evidence
of advanced weaponry that's being tested on the citizenry. Yet the very
strategies to covertly silence those who are awake to the truth are perfected
by experiments - using these very same technologies. The average, decent
citizen takes time to grasp the concept as it is evil on a scale that's
difficult to accept. "They" count on that.
Individually, psychopaths like Martin Bryant and Timothy McVeigh can be manipulated/steered onto a collision course with their unsuspecting victims by monsters who brainwash/provoke them (using neurophone voices etc) to execute the events for which they take sole blame. Not only is there no authority to investigate the agency criminals behind it, but the public don't understand how, let alone why, such evil is fostered. The technologies are veiled by secrecy orders and the motives blurred by MP's and the media but there can be no excuses.
UNDERSTANDING
THE TECHNOLOGIES
Pretend you've never used electricity or watched a plane in the sky. Forget
all the modern inventions you take for granted. Now, if you were told
about them by honest people with knowledge/experience would you believe
it? Many technologies have military applications that their inventor didn't
envisage. These can have secrecy orders placed on them and then only military
bodies/contractors can work on developing and advancing them. Once developed
these inventions can be tested and misused under a "National Security"
screen of silence. Defence contractors, criminals, agency oppressors…all
of these have access but not honest law enforcers or the general public.
For example, DARPA (The Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency) has a program called LIFELOG which records TV viewing, photographs taken etc over a lifetime. Another is ECHELON, the NSA system that monitors all telecommunications worldwide. With Echelon advanced computers highlight communications "of interest" for human operatives. Those involved can then be placed on 24/7 audio-visual satellite surveillance as "people of interest". They can be MP's, personalities, activists, law enforcers, terrorists etc. On top of that the neurophone and brainwave scanning technologies facilitate the torture and mental rape of chosen targets.
Again, to reiterate (for those unfamiliar with what this means) U.S satellites can track/monitor anyone using tags, infrared, brainwaves etc etc. E.g. For brain/thought monitoring the evoked potential emitted by the brain is scanned then decoded/interpreted by U.S/GB/Israeli supercomputers with a brainwave vocabulary. Also neurophones relay noise/voices via microwave/laser delivery systems. The signal travels the nervous system to the brain (bypassing the ears). The two together provide a means of remote torture/interrogation/deceit.
Law enforcers (honest ones) cannot access this equipment but criminals in the agencies, in media circles, in politics etc can. Again, their defence is the "National Security"/"Classified" tag but most of them, as outlined in this article, are terrorists themselves.
THE POLITICS
OF HUMAN RESEARCH
We hear more of illegal research involving animals than people yet cancer
cures, LSD trials, nuclear weapons testing and so on have all involved
human guinea pigs. Even organ donors risk having more taken than they
planned for. Horrific anecdotes have been relayed on this alone; stories
involving hospitals, morgues, universities etc. In fact, so insidious
and deceptive are their methods that "they" use statistics to encourage
drivers to indicate their willingness to donate organs on their licenses.
Ostensibly, that's fine but where's the guarantee that the donated parts
go where they should and what of "the rest"? Interestingly, one recent
TV ad for brain tissue donors focused on schizophrenia studies. This also
smacks of another "cover" for illegal research. Their reassurances ring
hollow.
These days the living guinea pigs for the experiments mentioned in this material are no longer just volunteers, students etc. Instead, people in institutions, helpless and alone, have been used and now anyone offending/questioning powerful criminals can be offered up to those involved in these experiments; studies in controlling other human beings remotely.
Unfortunately there is no human equivalent of the RSPCA. The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR - Church of Scientology) and CAHRA (Campaign Against Human Rights Abuse) do their best without resources or a public profile but their impact on the problem is minimal. However, sadly, mans inhumanity to man has few limits. Things you wouldn't see done to a dog are done to humans in the name of science, love, religion and the money/control they generate. Thankfully no other species is so "intelligently" organised.
Again, writers of anti-crime works, whistleblowers, in fact any honest/decent people who exercise their rights to freedom of speech, thought, expression etc can be selected, (by their enemies), for these programs. This terrorises, silences and discredits them personally but more so it gives their tormentors opportunities to study methods of covertly influencing (and altering if possible) belief systems, actions etc. They hope to learn how to predict/normalize/control human behaviour. They thereby want to discover how to deal (covertly) with dissenters; people who see through the lies and propaganda and speak out against evil practices.
Other purposes for the "research" may be to enhance methods of computer/human interfacing to the point that computers can almost think like humans. In fact, the US navy's National Research Laboratory in Washington has already conducted extensive research on computer chips with living brain cells. Stolen memories can also be used for robotics, cloning and all manner of mischief including selling results to interested parties.
Long term dream analysis (a personal favorite of psychiatrists we're told) can also be carried out without reliance on the targeted persons recollections. Subliminal suggestions, even false memories (and the warping of surveillance results), can be planted in further attempts to influence human thinking and reactions. In addition, for creative targets, ideas can be stolen or implanted. For others still, fears/attitudes etc can be moulded by the lies they're told and so on.
The goons delivering all of this harassment/torture can also facilitate ancillary perversions such as gambling on the outcomes e.g. when will a targeted person lose their temper, their job, their partner, their life. Great fun for all concerned especially the filth that set the target up in the first place. In the case of opposite sex monitors still more evil "enjoyment" can be found. There is literally no limit to the level of degrading, humiliating treatment these monsters can dish out.
Cross sections of the community can also be tested as a group; usually without their knowledge e.g. crowd mood management during marches, elections, riots can be arranged/attempted using EEG feedback over a large area. And, of course, defence personnel are subjected to the testing of some very nasty lethal and non/lethal weaponry (on both sides). E.g. neurophones were used on Iraqi soldiers. Chemical, biological, even nuclear weapons can also be tested on troops.
Also, worth mentioning are the people who "disappear" (30,000 a year in Australia alone). You could be forgiven for wondering if some weren't spirited away to some hidden facility for more face to face type research, brainwashing etc. Runaways, custody pawns, murder victims, protected witnesses, criminals, enslaved victims and so on form the bulk of the numbers but I'm sure "science" takes its share. Those few who survive to return to loved ones may be deluded (e.g. by their U.S/"alien" captors) or worse still, programmed (like Martin Bryant) to commit horrendous crimes for reasons only the criminally insane could comprehend (they're usually political of financial reasons).
Although not too many remote targets can be successfully "triggered" to commit crimes like Bryant's they must still endure torture and deprivation of physical, emotional and mental liberty. For example, EM radiation/laser/microwave weapons can mimic signals emitted by the brain and nervous system. The relevant devices can also disrupt that system. The symptoms are coordinated (deliberately) to mirror mental illness which complicit psychiatrists diagnose, on cue, (as taught through agency modified texts).
THE RESEARCHERS
Dr Stefan Possony (the "father" or Star Wars) said, in 1995, that "messaging
directly into a target mind with low frequency waves" was possible. But
this had been known for decades before that and he would have known it.
Why the act? The suppression, then timely open expression of such information
is of concern… Another control freak, John Alexander (a NATO chief) speaks
of compulsory implants for newborns. This is an evil, insane notion yet
its dangers have been ignored. In any event, it's unnecessary in one sense
since mind modifiers, EEG feedback devices, neurophones, brain-scanner
and radiation technologies can achieve total, submissive control of large
sections of the citizenry without their cooperation or even their knowledge,
in some cases. So, if political propaganda and media imaging fail, these
devices are in reserve to effect obedience and conformity to the New World
Orders ways of thinking. Yes they have ways…
Incidentally, Nazi/U.S scientist, Dr Herman P Schner, said: "There are no proven biological effects from electromagnetic radiation". More patent nonsense. Yet a colleague, Dr Schmitt, openly confessed to using a magnetic interpreted neuron duplicator on inmates at San Quentin prison where he was chief psychiatrist. Needless to say interference with potentially violent criminals can have dire consequences. Nevertheless, our jails, like our asylums, nursing homes, etc…are just playgrounds for the monsters behind all of this. For instance, it's no surprise to learn that NSW jails, at Goulburn and Junee, have large numbers of prisoners complaining of neurophone harassment (voices in the head). Junee jail is privately run by Americans who handpick their victims/inmates. The inmate (from Goulburn) who relayed this information in the first instance has been set up, robbed and so on for his troubles. False medical records have been prepared claiming he has a heart condition (just in case they want to dispose of him…) and a history of violence in Ireland (a country he has not even visited). Yet the same victim successfully introduced articles, patents and so on (relating to the high tech devices described herein) to a jury which supported his contention that they'd been used on himself and others. And this faced with a hostile judge, corruptible crown prosecutor and three government psychiatrists all of whom claimed total ignorance. Even armed with false psychiatric assessments (paid for by the state to discredit this man) they could not have him labeled as mentally unfit. Unfortunately, others harassed by neurophone voices have, on their eventual release from prison, either been set up or killed almost immediately.
Other interesting views on human research come from Mathew S Meselson who said "we'll learn how to manipulate every life process, genetic ones, mental ones, emotional ones" and Dr Robin Coupland who talks of "weapons that can cause psychosis, epilepsy, blindness etc." Instead of referring lovingly to such madness these "gents" would do well to follow the lead of Dr Rosalie Bertell who, instead, sympathetically and openly studied the victims of radiation weapons at Greenham Common. This was another despicable series of murders by "the state" aimed at peaceful anti nuclear protestors.
The fact remains that, overall, there is little open discussion (legal/moral) on neurotechnology, dream analysis, human cloning research, advanced (humanoid) robotics, directed energy weapons or any other diabolical programs which misuse modern technological advances at the expense of the citizenry. The law and the parliaments lag way behind…and intentionally so. Like the LSD trials and the nuclear tests decades ago we have protected military/agency operations going on which are removed from public scrutiny by secretive government/"business" bodies. The results are appalling, inexcusable evil directed at decent, honest people from all walks of life.
THE FUTURE?
For the privileged few, the complicit, the silent, (including our "secretive"
groups), the future is rosy. They'll survive unscathed and continue to
mock those of us who their delusions tell them are inferior. "Inferior"
because we think and act differently to themselves. This "inferior", largely
law abiding, majority will of course have less to look forward to. Brainscanning
technology is enough of a danger in itself.
To elaborate, aside from plans to cull the worlds population back to a manageable billion or two (and you won't feel a thing) the covert agencies are working towards total invasion of every home, every mind on the planet. Microchipping for security/ID purposes is only the next cover. The real motives are illegal research, larceny, perversion and total control, up to and including euthanasia/extermination through incurable disease/cancer etc. (By the way, one biblical interpretation refers to microchip enslavement of the world at the end of time). Today, astronauts submit to it for research and celebrities may agree for security purposes but the public agrees at its peril. Anyway, as said earlier, microchipping is unnecessary given the satellite-based technologies now available. It's a cover; another diversion.
Given all of this, you could be forgiven for entertaining fanciful ideas such as the thought that scientists could create human clones, insert stolen human memories (extracted via brainwave scanning) then use neurophone relayed instructions etc to get them to organise/ run the whole world on behalf of their faceless, criminal masters. However, given the enthusiastic way corrupt power brokers (MP's/journalists/"businessmen") make a sport out of destroying decent people (usually covertly) today that's probably an unnecessary scenario. Perhaps it is only an illustrative notion like the "one world government" described in my unpublished fictional novel, "In the year 2252" (1991). In that story, given there were no more kingdoms to conquer, no causes to unify the haves and have nots, no external distractions, no one to blame for anything (be it social inequity, drugs, weapons/space research etc) then an "alien" sham was viewed as being as good as any available to shift the blame and divert unwanted attention. In the fantasy agencies, military or otherwise, would use secret/classified technologies to disastrous effect then rally public support (to play hero) in a scenario of their own creation. Unfortunately that sounded a little too close to today's reality for their liking, especially in an age where provoked global terrorism was about to take centre stage…But apparently we don't need to know the truth. Others more trustworthy than us have it all under control. So, the 99% that would be sickened by the truth must simply defer to their greater wisdom.
ENOUGH
IS ENOUGH
(Progress in the war on psychological/emotional terror).
The 80's was to be the "decade of the brain" according to the U.S government. Unfortunately the secret research conducted was largely inhuman and counterproductive. Sadly it continues to this day, unchecked. This fact has been recognized recently by a number of prominent international organizations. These include The International Committee of The Red Cross, CAHRA (Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse), CCHR (The Citizens Commission on Human Rights - Church of Scientology) and CAMS (Christians Against Mental Slavery). Influential individuals like U.S senator (and ex-astronaut) John Glenn, U.S rep Dennis Kucinich and President Bill Clinton have introduced bills and so on which address the problems associated with illegal human experimentation, including the abuse of remote mind control weapons. However, to date, nothing has been done in reply. Everything is watered down.
Regardless, perhaps the two most significant moves have been made by the European Parliament and The United Nations. The European Parliament passed the "Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy", A4 - 0005/99, Jan 28th, 1999. This called for a world wide convention to ban all weapons for human manipulation. Also the UN, through UNIDIR (the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research), recognised and listed "mind control" weapons, putting them alongside nuclear and chemical weapons as weapons of potential "mass destruction" because of the manipulative possibilities. The UN too wants an international treaty to ban these weapons. They published material for the world wide media to use/disseminate but they have failed to do so. Ask yourself why. In fact the media is more likely to warp public perception on matters like "mind control" than it is to inform them. For example, a recent TV program with that title, "Mind Control" (2003), focuses on hypnotism not high tech satellite interference. (See Addendum for a list of organizations and contacts re formal opposition to the weapons in question).
Because they anticipate further calls for treaties/bans on weapons for human torture and manipulation the US government is now systematically shifting responsibility for some of these technologies from the Defence Department to the internal Department of Energy. This is to evade the impact of any treaty/ban. Secretary of Energy O'Leary has apparently admitted that half a million US citizens (at least) have already been experimented on without their consent (or knowledge in the case of most). This confession alone should rank the emotional/psychological/physical torture and terror involved alongside anything orchestrated by a Dr Mengele, a Saddam Hussein, an Idi Amin or any other fiend for whom "crimes against humanity" are mere recreational pursuits. They can call it conditioning or any other euphemism they like, the fact is the victims are true "prisoners of conscience", to apply a term Amnesty International uses for physical, political prisoners, short or long term, (e.g. well known ex victims like Pauline Hanson and Nelson Mandela). Again, because our media is controlled by complicit vested interest groups they not only remain silent on such matters but are likely to exacerbate a victim's pain by actively participating; contributing to the suffering of targets with lies/deception, surveillance feedback and more. With no regulation or watchdog, with no empowered law enforcement agency to investigate and no politician free of fear of favour it's little wonder that the UN has been largely ignored on these matters…so far.
PERSONAL
COMMENTS
In my own view the greatest (and worst) inventions of all time have been
facilitated by the microchip. The brain scanning (mind reading) technologies
alone represent the greatest threat to the "free" world that there has
ever been. Aside from theft, oppression, torture, manipulation, military/political
conquest and control, the horrific human rights abuses (starting with
the most intrusive invasions of privacy) make these devices horrific/evil
beyond the comprehension of most people. Some I've spoken to say they
cannot imagine anything more frightening than mental rape. But when the
corrupt agencies eventually run their "Thought Police" scans over the
entire planet (in the same way Echelon monitors all telecommunications
already) then anyone even doubting what they're told by those in high
places will draw "special attention" from human operatives. And this before
they even mouthe their concerns let alone convey them in a written form.
This one alone could enslave the entire world and change it, for the worse,
forever. Oppression/repression will lead to complete suppression. Freedom
of thought, speech and expression of any sort will be only a memory (and
probably a forbidden one at that). Democracy will become even more of
a facade/farce than it already is, a system where attempts to exercise
your democratic rights can lead to you losing them altogether. Differences
of opinion on matters relating to crime/corruption already top the list.
Even the silent majority who do, say or think only what they're told (deviating only between a narrow band of opinions) could be affected. The one safe democratic right, the right to vote for one of two "controlled" political parties (the rest incapable of forming governments), can be influenced unduly, not only by propaganda/lies but by mood/thought management technologies that people are unaware of. This raises an ancillary matter. In such an environment (which we call a democracy) is it democratic to make any service/duty compulsory? Electoral duty (voting), judicial duty (jury service) and military duty (where there's national service) are all (or can be) compulsory. Yet to vote for political representatives, take part in court proceedings or fight a foreign war without reference to personal (informed) opinion is anything but democratic. If the systems and individuals in question draw justifiable criticism or rejection that should be addressed not sugar coated by compulsory endorsement. Also, from my observations, class, cultural, religious and ideological "cleansing" can be carried out very slowly, over time, using stealth and deception. For example, very few whistleblowers seem to have children once they're criminally harassed. The ones that do wind up having those children harassed as well (some from birth). In the long run society's views can be altered to correspond with what the ruling elite believe, and few will be any the wiser. Those still disagreeing will become afraid to even express their views; especially when they see the dire consequences for others. We are being told not to think, only react…and react as expected, or else.
In such a situation those in the affluent west who have a conscience are also silenced on certain matters; powerless to help the starving, diseased, war ravaged and oppressed peoples of the rest of the world where 25,000 die of starvation alone every day. Today, opponents of all manner of injustices are ridiculed, set up, robbed, (mentally) raped, tormented and often totally destroyed (usually in private) using high tech. Our media and political identities are often at the heart of the problem (or sympathetic with the criminal activities in question) so they will not intervene. Yet again, it is vital to understanding the problem that the reader realises that "they" vet all who enter public life; especially in politics and the mainstream media. Only the corruptible, malleable and fearfully silent are tolerated. If confronted these people feign ignorance and delude themselves into believing they are not to blame; being beyond reproach. Meanwhile mass media surveillance feedback (including sly references to private words/actions/thoughts) is responsible for the grief of many targeted individuals. And the writers can't be blamed in isolation. What of the sources? And what of the actors, singers, presenters that deliver the pain? "It's my job"…"I only read it"…"I do what I'm told" "I didn't know". None of these is a real/legitimate excuse. They are used to drive a wedge between victims and any source of assistance.
From my perspective, our secret societies, our vested interest groups either order, effect or allow all manner of ills in our world today. The web of conspirational arrangements woven perverts justice and creates class resentment. Honest endeavour is to be mocked by thieves in high places and those speaking of justice? Ridiculed AND crucified…
Again, for those unaware of the fact - Big Brother is NOT the law. He's the agent/criminal who thwarts the law enforcer. He works for the drug baron, the arms dealer, the oppressor etc. So the old argument that you don't need to be alarmed if you're doing nothing wrong is seriously flawed. You don't have to do anything wrong; Big Brother and his associates are the wrong doers and they monitor/harass those who question their crimes. Law enforcers should have the resources to investigate these high tech crimes but the criminals monitor them too and so stay "one step ahead". This should change but I suspect it won't.
As for those that Big Brother fosters, obeys and protects, (those removed from the sane, moral world by the exaltations of position, power and science)…Technology allows them to see and hear from afar, to monitor through all obstacles, to read men's minds and create/destroy life itself in ever more bizarre ways…but they are not Gods. They are motivated by greed not altruism, by hate not love…and standing on a podium or sitting behind a desk and pretending to be something they're not, no matter how good the act, is ultimately transparent to more and more, despite the media staging. Meanwhile, for the majority, those that can't explain let alone create whole universes, God cannot be removed from the picture no matter how inconvenient that may be for "them". Theories which seem to credit our existence to some sort of cosmic accident, no matter how fancifully described, don't work for us. Yet for others it's as if they legitimise the prevailing system, the law of the jungle, by endorsing such theories/beliefs. Well we have it already; a world where crime pays and the groups/societies behind it influence every sector in the community. Deluding themselves into actually believing that they are rightfully above the law, and therefore not subject to it, these people have nothing but disdain and derision for anyone suggesting that integrity and fair play should be the norm. An honest, level playing field is not their idea of good sport.
Finally, for true believers, our free will is God given. May I suggest that secretive organizations and individuals wishing to take his place (and remove that gift) band together… Lacking integrity, conscience, faith or good intention they proclaim all things are possible for man. All things good or evil or both? I think we know. So perhaps a more correct title for such a collection of rogues would be "The Sons of Satan" because, whether they believe in him or not, they're following in his footsteps.
CONCLUSION
Our democratic and human rights are in jeopardy, right now. A total loss
of privacy, dignity and control in our own lives is on the horizon. For
many it's already here. The New World order will eventually enslave us,
one way or another, and it's not a conspiracy theory it's a reality. They
mould things to suit their own purposes yet the rest of us are told "you
can't change the world". No reversals, only "progress". Progress for who?
And at who's expense? To object is to invite terrorists into your life;
to silence/torture/discredit you.
Affluent onlookers are unaffected and so ignore the dangers for others and the shameful truth is hidden by political/media/business groups. They protect the ugly operations described in this article (just as "they", in turn protect them). Dialogue is avoided, especially where majority views and interests simply don't rate. The answers are also unclear for the individual but silence is definitely not one of them. It is for the UN and similarly empowered bodies to stand up to this openly and publicly. Those promoting evil, perverting justice and suppressing the truth must be held accountable and stopped.
ADDENDUM
FOR "VICTIMS"
ADVICE AND SUPPORT CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH THE FOLLOWING ORGANISATIONS/PEOPLE:
  |
MIND JUSTICE NEWS GROUP CONTACT – ALLEN BARKER alb@datafilter.com |
| |
MIND JUSTICE FORMALLY CAHRA (CITIZENS AGAINST HUMAN
RIGHTS ABUSE) CONTACT – CHERYL WELSH welsh@dcn.davis.ca.us OR welsh@mindjustice.org NOTE: THEY ALSO RUN VICTIMS STORIES ON THE INTERNET – SEE MIND CONTROL FORUM ( www.mk.net/~mcf/victim-hm.htm) |
| |
THE INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS, GENEVA. THEY ARE FIGHTING THE “CONCENTRATION CAMP” SITUATION RE: POLITICAL TARGETS WHO ARE OPPRESSED COVERTLY. COMMITTEE – D.COYE 022 734 6001 |
| |
THE UN … IN PARTICULAR UNIDIR (THE UN INSTITUTE FOR DISARMAMENT RESEARCH, unidir@unorg.ch) WHICH NOW OFFICIALLY RECOGNISES NON-LETHAL/MIND CONTROL WEAPONS AND RECOMMENDS THEIR REMOVAL. (The Human Rights Committee should also help but are slow to react). |
| |
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, WHICH PASSED A RESOLUTION (CALLED “RESOLUTION ON THE ENVIRONMENT, SECURITY AND FOREIGN POLICY”) A4-0005/99, JAN 28TH 99 WHICH CALLED FOR A WORLD WIDE CONVENTION TO BAN THESE WEAPONS FOR HUMAN MANIPULATION. |
| |
US REP DENNIS KUCINICH (D-OH). HE INTRODUCED A BILL TO BAN WEAPONS IN SPACE. IT WAS CALLED “THE SPACE PRESERVATION ACT OF 2001”(HR 2977) (SEE http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh1-02-3.htm) THE U.S CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS SHOW THAT “MIND CONTROL”, “PSYCHOTRONIC WEAPONS” AND “ MOOD MANAGEMENT” WERE REFERRED TO IN HR 2977; EVIDENCE THAT THE TECHNOLOGY EXISTS. UNFORTUNATELY THE BILL HAD TO BE REINTRODUCED AS HR 3616, WHICH WAS WATERED DOWN AND EXCLUDED THE TERMS THAT WORRIED THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EVIL TECHNOLOGY IN QUESTION. |
| |
MICHIGAN GOVERNOR (www.senate.michigan.gov) PUBLIC ACTS 256 AND 257 (28/12/03) OUTLAW USING EM WEAPONS ON ANYONE (PENALTY – 15YRS TO LIFE) |
| |
THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY – CAPP (CAMPAIGN AGAINST POLITICAL PSYCHIATRY) |
| |
CAMS – CHRISTIANS AGAINST MENTAL SLAVERY. CONTACT: JOHN ALLMAN (John_W_Allman@hotmail.com) ALSO info@slavery.org.uk |
| |
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL |
| |
JUDY WALL, ED “RESONANCE” MAGAZINE 684 CR 535 SUMTERVILLE FLORIDA 33585 USA |
| |
DR RAUNI KILDE (EX CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, FINLAND) KildeMD@aol.com OR VIA ELEANOR WHITE – eleanor@Raven1.net |
| |
THE MIND CONTROL FORUM – www.mk.net/~mcf/victm-hm.htm (100’S OF VICTIMS STORIES) |
| |
DI HARRISON, EDITOR “EXPOSURE”, ausorn@hypermax.net.au |
|
|
MIND CONTROL MAGAZINE – CONTACT: RON PATTON endure_to_the_end@yahoo.com |
| |
LYNN SURGALLO, Peace / H.R. Activist and former Vice President US Psychotronics Association, lasurg@comcast.net |
LOCALLY, SUPPORT AND INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH PAUL BAIRD – PHONE: (02) 9635 0752 (H) OR p.baird@surveillanceissues.com AND THE WEBSITE www.surveillanceissues.com
Article
As most of us realise there are numerous ways to manipulate people's thoughts and beliefs. Propaganda and lies can be delivered through education, literature, the media and so on. In particular, the status of public figures of all sorts allows them to be used in the brainwashing process, especially if they've been criminally compromised.
Read the rest of the article (PDF file download)
COVERT CENSORSHIP
| |
Corrupt government agencies and their criminal contacts can covertly attack honest citizens especially those who criticize their criminal operations or conduct. |
| |
They can abuse these people using high tech satellite surveillance equipment as well as satellite-based psychotronic and directed energy weapons. |
| |
This is hidden from public scrutiny by bogus "National Security" laws drafted by the US government and its allies. |
| |
The complicit mainstream media co-operates fully because of the legal ramifications and the fact that (as with the bulk of the entertainment industry) it is criminally owned and managed. |
| |
The result of all of this is that many innocent people who attempt to highlight important issues are silenced, isolated, discredited or institutionalized. |
THE PRETENCE
| |
A "National Security"cover allows those responsible to PRETEND that their innocent targets are guilty of something… or under suspicion or potentially dangerous or anything that they can tell themselves to somehow justify the inhuman treatment they mete out to their enemies; in secret. |
| |
Their secret (usually remote, satellite-based) technology can track targets by many means, including by their brains unique electronic resonance frequencies. It can monitor audio-visually, inflict pain/disease, create or change moods and reactions, deliver computer-generated or relayed voices to the brain, read minds and cause other seemingly inexplicable happenings of an apparent psychic, paranormal or extraterrestrial nature. |
| |
These secret weapons can cause targets to suicide, commit murders, be driven to madness and so on but most victims avoid these pitfalls and simply seek help from doctors, law enforcers, MP's, journalists etc. Even that is generally not a good move because ignorance, fear and complicity mean that little or no help is forthcoming from these people. For many (including MP's and journalists) a further pretence involves the self-delusion that this is all somehow necessary to hide the truth or silence certain opinions that are different to their own. This then accompanies their general denial that such horrific thing even happen let alone that they're involved personally. |
PUBLIC FIGURES' ROLE
| |
Public figures are fed the results of 24/7 surveillance operations carried out on targets; the gathering, of their words, thoughts and actions. |
| |
Writers working for criminals/agencies sew the results into public figures speeches, scripts etc as they're gleaned from the surveillance. Celebrities may be told lies about the target or who/what the target is but, basically, they'll do it regardless (for money and opportunity). |
| |
People are screened (by the CIA etc) as they enter public life to ensure that they'll remain silent/co-operative/pliable. Most can be easily blackmailed/threatened by agencies/criminals and are simply puppets dangling from the "Godfathers" strings with "Big Brother" overseeing their operations and intervening when necessary. |
| |
All involved have sold out and sold their souls. Their conduct is illegal, indefensible, inexcusable and inhuman and they belong in prison for their part in it. |
| |
Even those merely acquiescing are accessories/accomplices because they're providing a "legitimate" cover for these criminal practices. |
LAW ENFORCERS ROLE
| |
Police, like other professionals, are not officially told about any of this though some learn of it during their careers. |
| |
They are not told because… (i) They themselves can be monitored/harassed by wealthy criminals, using the relevant technology, if they get too close to their operations (as one-time acting NSW Police Commissioner, Bev Lawson, confirmed for me personally). Knowledge of this would cause an outcry and a mass exodus from the forces. Similar monitoring occurs for ex-services personnel who leave with "classified" information about corrupt agency practices. (ii) Police ignorance prevents honest law enforcers from believing/helping victims, thus discrediting and isolating them. |
PSYCHIATRYS ROLE
| |
The psychiatric diagnostic manuals are (in part)
written and set up by corrupt government agency personnel (especially
in the U.S.A) so as to provide an easy means of discrediting people
who complain about covert harassment. Psych students are basically
taught that if you can't see it or it leaves no evidence it doesn't
exist, didn't happen and the complainant must be delusional. Their
position therefore protects government agencies and clever criminals,
allowing the following injustices:- (i) All complaints about covert harassment can be dismissed as "paranoia". (ii) All complaints about voice to brain technology can be dismissed as"schizophrenia". (iii) All complaints about media feedback of surveillance can be dismissed as "delusional". (iv) All complaints about oppression, torture, abduction etc can be dismissed as "fantasy". |
| |
Most psychiatrists discredit complainants out of ignorance or self interest but others (including the spy agency psychiatrists who coined most of the numbered terms above) act with full knowledge and total malice. Some even work within the actual experimental programs that are designed to study human responses to "remote control" stimuli. |
| |
Those behind the programs help to create assassins and vegetables, conflicts and conspiracies, attractions or aversions, successes or failures… and all as an experiment for political/economic advantage. |
| CIRCUMSTANCE | DELIBERATE MISINTERPRETATION |
| Spoken or written opposition to criminal activity | Intention to act as a vigilante or investigator |
| Fictional writing about corruption, war etc | Intention to advocate real-life revolutionary action. |
| Natural anger at criminal harassment by public figures | Intention to respond criminally yourself |
| Observing and commenting on what criminal public figures are doing | Intention to join them in some way or other |
| Refusal to be "set up" by the media publicly | Intention to hide something |
| Refusal to be manipulated in any way by criminals | Intention to remain idle/useless |
| Association with fellow victims of high tech harassment | Intention to adopt their beliefs, lifestyles etc |
| Natural, normal defences to remote harassment | Intentions that are mad, bad, sad etc |
| TOPIC | THE BRAINWASHING | THE TRUTH |
| "National Security" laws | They protect us | They're mainly a cover for the crimes of the gov't/military/corporate conglomerate |
| Spies | They help and protect us | They're mostly thugs working for oppressors |
| Conspiracy theories | They're paranoid beliefs | The world is run by (and for) co-conspirators (the mafia, the illuminati, the cosa nostra, the CIA, DIA, MI6, the mossad etc). They control the media and hence our perception/knowledge of their role |
| Public figures | They're worthy of our respect/trust | Many work for/with criminals in the drug trade, war promotion, ideas piracy etc. Most are phonies |
| Democracy | We choose our representatives and they work for us | All politicians are vetted by the CIA etc. At the entry, pre-election and election, stages, scandals/blackmail etc control them. They do what the wealthy criminals ask or they're out of office (or worse) |
| War, famine, poverty, diseases, illicit drugs | All are unavoidable | All could be greatly reduced if not eliminated (but it's not profitable to do so) |
| |
Live as normal a life as possible; work, play, socialise, pray. By doing this you partially thwart their monstrous remote control experiments. |
| |
Maintain the rage; continue to speak out and write about their crimes especially the hellish mistreatment they force people to endure. By doing this you defeat their attempts to silence and discredit you. |
| |
Speak only to honest, intelligent, courageous people about your own situation; to avoid frustration. |
| |
Cope and survive. |
Technologies | Surveillance | Surveillance Results | Case Study | References
Copyright P. Baird,
1998-2007
Last updated August 2007
Designed by Web Warriors
- (Audio Surveillance) 
